Support Board
Support Board
Search Board
Control Panel
View My Posts / Threads
Direct MessagesDate/Time: Sat, 18 May 2024 05:25:08 +0000
Sierra Chart Performance
View Count: 757
| [2021-04-23 11:08:42] |
| User999835 - Posts: 28 |
|
From a performance standpoint, when you have a relatively large number of charts opened, is it better to have all the charts in one chartbook or spread across chartbooks or does it make no difference at all? Thank you |
| [2021-04-23 15:02:32] |
| John - SC Support - Posts: 31704 |
|
It does not make a difference in terms of Chartbooks. But what can be helpful is to have multiple sub-instances of Sierra Chart to spread the load. Refer to the following: High CPU Usage | Inactive User Interface | Poor Performance | Long Time to Load Chart Data | Charts Reloading Often: 30.47 - Use Sub Instances to Distribute Processing Load For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, use the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
| [2021-04-23 16:52:50] |
| User999835 - Posts: 28 |
|
Thank you, much appreciated.
|
| [2021-04-26 18:49:45] |
| |
|
It can make a difference with operating system resources. If they are in different Chartbooks and you have set this option, then that reduces resources: General Settings Window: Destroy Chart Windows when Hidden (Global Settings >> General Settings >> GUI >> Application GUI) Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing Date Time Of Last Edit: 2021-04-26 18:50:21
|
To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account: