Support Board
Date/Time: Tue, 14 May 2024 19:39:30 +0000
Relative Volume study - trap for young players
View Count: 1859
[2016-07-29 09:56:36] |
User13668 - Posts: 291 |
This part of the documentation refers: http://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?page=doc/TechnicalStudiesReference.html#s356 It maybe useful for you to add a comment to this that for reliable/accurate results it should be applied to a time based chart with a CONTINUOUS contract. I could not figure out why the study on a 2 minute CL (Oil) chart was giving silly results (like always well over 200% for Cumm RVOL) compared to my 30 minute CL chart which was showing more believable Cumm RVOL like 86%. After a while I clicked that the difference was due to the 2 minute chart NOT being a continuous contract. For something like the CL (oil) contract with monthly rollovers using a continuous contract will be essential - especially when one is using look back periods of a number of days to calculate the historical average. |
[2016-07-30 00:04:26] |
Sierra Chart Engineering - Posts: 104368 |
We are updating the documentation now.
Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing Date Time Of Last Edit: 2016-07-30 00:04:41
|
[2021-07-05 14:32:01] |
User377189 - Posts: 154 |
Is the 2 min chart still NOT continuous contract? Which charts are continuous and which are not? |
[2021-07-05 14:38:47] |
User907968 - Posts: 802 |
Which charts are continuous and which are not?
You need to configure the charts according to you requirements - Continuous Futures Contract Charts |
To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account: