Support Board
Date/Time: Sun, 29 Jun 2025 17:49:48 +0000
Relative Volume study - trap for young players
View Count: 2023
| [2016-07-29 09:56:36] |
| User13668 - Posts: 294 |
|
This part of the documentation refers: http://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?page=doc/TechnicalStudiesReference.html#s356 It maybe useful for you to add a comment to this that for reliable/accurate results it should be applied to a time based chart with a CONTINUOUS contract. I could not figure out why the study on a 2 minute CL (Oil) chart was giving silly results (like always well over 200% for Cumm RVOL) compared to my 30 minute CL chart which was showing more believable Cumm RVOL like 86%. After a while I clicked that the difference was due to the 2 minute chart NOT being a continuous contract. For something like the CL (oil) contract with monthly rollovers using a continuous contract will be essential - especially when one is using look back periods of a number of days to calculate the historical average. |
| [2016-07-30 00:04:26] |
| |
|
We are updating the documentation now.
Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing Date Time Of Last Edit: 2016-07-30 00:04:41
|
| [2021-07-05 14:32:01] |
| User377189 - Posts: 216 |
|
Is the 2 min chart still NOT continuous contract? Which charts are continuous and which are not? |
| [2021-07-05 14:38:47] |
| User907968 - Posts: 840 |
|
Which charts are continuous and which are not?
You need to configure the charts according to you requirements - Continuous Futures Contract Charts |
To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account: