Date/Time: Sun, 09 Aug 2020 04:52:49 +0000
Difference in POC, VAH and VAL between Volume Value Area Lines study and VbP study
|User106180 - Posts: 88 | Ending Date: 2019-09-10 [Expired]|
There is a difference in the POC, VAH and VAL lines between the Volume Value Area Lines study and VbP study.
Both are set to 'Draw Developing Value Area Lines', and 'Ticks per Volume Bar' of 2. All other settings appear to be consistent between the two studies as well. Please see attached chartbook which has these two studies. The difference is particularly noticeable for the day 5-10. Why is there a difference between the two, they should be the same?
Volume Value Area Lines - https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?page=doc/StudiesReference.php&ID=209&Name=Volume_Value_Area_Lines
Volume by Price - https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?page=doc/StudiesReference.php&ID=141&Name=Volume_by_Price
SC.Cht - Attached On 2018-05-15 02:31:55 UTC - Size: 39.38 KB - 85 views
Sierra Chart Engineering - Posts: 88452 | Ending Date: 2021-04-05
We are looking into this. It appears like this issue has something to do with a slight rounding error because of the Ticks per Volume Bar being set to 2. In any case, we will solve it.
Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level
Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. If possible please keep your questions brief and to the point. Please be aware of support policy:
If your question/request has been answered and you do not have anything further, then it is easiest for us if you do not reply again to say thank you.
|User882670 - Posts: 5 | Ending Date: 2020-08-31|
I have similar problem but with Value Area Lines (not volume).
In TPO study - I've selected calculation based on TPO. Value area high and low are different than in TPO Value Area Lines study
To post a message in this thread, you need to login with your Sierra Chart account: