Support Board
Support Board
Search Board
Control Panel
View My Posts / Threads
Direct MessagesDate/Time: Sat, 04 May 2024 18:37:10 +0000
Study Subgraphs Difference Question
View Count: 910
| [2018-03-16 08:25:02] |
| User942837 - Posts: 108 |
|
Hi SC, Kindly have a look at the attached image. I am not sure if the problem is coming from the study subgraphs difference or from the Volume Value area lines study but something seems odd. Input study 1 (for the study subgraphs difference) is the Purple line, and Input study 2 is the Teal line. The dashes in the bottom region of the image seem correct but the difference study is not reflecting this as the line should extending lower for the next bar and it is going up. Just to put context into this, the purple line is a developing vpoc and the teal is a vpoc that is not developing and has a reference of N periods back set to 1. Can you kindly look into what's wrong please? |
Private File |
| [2018-03-16 18:37:27] |
| |
|
Analyzing this is not within the scope of our support but this might be related to study calculation precedence: Chart Studies: Study Calculation Precedence And Related Issues You also need to consider that there could be changes with the referenced Subgraphs, during a chart update which is earlier than where the calculation is starting at with the Study Subgraphs Difference study, which is going to normally be at the last chart bar. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing Date Time Of Last Edit: 2018-03-16 18:38:11
|
| [2018-03-16 18:40:30] |
| |
|
Actually, we do understand what the problem is. We have to do an update to the Volume Value Area Lines to properly support Study Subgraphs Difference.
Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
| [2018-03-16 19:41:42] |
| |
|
This is now resolved in version 1718. If not let us know.
Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
| [2018-03-21 09:11:37] |
| User942837 - Posts: 108 |
|
Hi SC, thank you for your reply. Although I've seen some improvements, When I tried using it again using the Study subgraphs difference and set ln:8 (study 2 subgraph offset) to -1. I am again getting inconsistent differences that is not properly subtracting from the previous bar vpoc value. (see attached image). If the vpoc shifts are doing lower lows, shouldn't the subgraphs difference study also follow that pattern? If not, is there a difference study I can use that would keep going down in the direction of the vpoc shifts that I am expecting. Can you look into this please? Thanks Date Time Of Last Edit: 2018-03-21 09:25:43
|
Private File |
To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account: