Support Board
Date/Time: Tue, 13 May 2025 21:39:41 +0000
Post From: SC data issue
| [2016-05-11 18:04:24] |
| |
|
Actually, the Sierra Chart data feed did very well even though you do notice the gap. We checked CQG and they transmitted half the volume. Although you do not see the gap, the volume from CQG was 995 for that second (10:30:00). The Sierra Chart data feed volume is 2018 for that symbol. We are also checking this further and noticing the CQG data feed was lagging. The Sierra Chart data feed did not lag. So it appears our prior conclusions were wrong. The Sierra Chart data feed performed much better than CQG. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing Date Time Of Last Edit: 2016-05-11 18:08:32
|