Support Board
Date/Time: Sun, 11 May 2025 02:21:04 +0000
Post From: Real Time Data Feed quality
| [2015-10-14 18:07:01] |
| |
|
You cannot make the kind of comparison you are. Charts based upon number of trades per bar inherently will look different between services and software due to different Session Times and/or the starting time at the beginning of the chart. Everywhere we look, we see differences which means there is a problem with the starting time for the chart bars. The Sierra Chart Exchange Data feed is fine. There is no doubt about that whatsoever. Anyone else using the data feed is welcome to comment on that. There is another explanation here. We will not accept the analysis that you are doing because it is not a trustworthy and reliable method. Open a chart for the ES market and set the chart bars to 5 minutes per bar and verify you see the [M] after the symbol. Add the Volume study. Let the chart run in real-time for about 10 minutes and then re-download the last 10 minutes of data. Do you notice a change with the OHLC values or the Volume? We are doing this test now. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing Date Time Of Last Edit: 2015-10-14 18:07:22
|