Support Board
Date/Time: Sun, 26 Apr 2026 17:18:31 +0000
Post From: Feature Request: Momentum Tails
| [2026-04-02 15:17:21] |
| Sébastien - Posts: 142 |
|
Hi, I did some side by side tests between your study v2.0.5 (with Histogram ON) and native SC prints. Results : - I still see the Histogram false signals happening all the time at tail extremities. I can't spot any change. For this to happen, of course there must be stale volume printed. So it is only happening when market pull-back on existing volume. Additional remarks : - Just so you know, I noticed I need to set the Color Change (ms) to 210ms (with 10 color levels) to mimic exactly the 1500ms SC Clear Recent Bid Ask Volume Inactive Time in Milliseconds. I was expecting to use 150ms * 10 levels = 1500ms to mimic SC 1500ms tail, but your study is a little bit faster than SC. Of course it has no negative impact. Again, it's just for your information. - During my side by side test with SC native volume, I noticed that when the market swipe through levels very fast, your study fail to print a lot of prints. it creates "holes" in the tail, where in the SC native volume there is no holes. See first screenshot (this was a fast swipe across 7-8 levels that lasted less than 100ms). I tried to lower my Chart Update Interval to 10ms but I got the same result. The screenshot shows the ES... But it makes me wonder how much volume I am not seeing on the NQ. Since NQ "national sport" is swiping very fast through everything all the time... I think light markets like NQ would benefit a lot to keep the native SC prints while using your study only for Big Prints/Histogram. I'll do a side by side comparison with NQ instead of ES later today. |
 Screenshot 2026-04-02 162937.png / V - Attached On 2026-04-02 14:55:18 UTC - Size: 14.12 KB - 24 views Screenshot 2026-04-02 162301.png / V - Attached On 2026-04-02 14:58:36 UTC - Size: 11.59 KB - 18 views |