Support Board
Date/Time: Sun, 26 Apr 2026 17:18:31 +0000
Post From: Feature Request: Momentum Tails
| [2026-03-26 15:56:33] |
| Sébastien - Posts: 142 |
|
Hi gcUserStudies, Once again, thank you very much for your awesome work. I've been testing the V2 since yesterday. The settings window is a great idea. It's so much easier to configure now. The Big Prints feature is awesome ! This is a huge edge. Thank you for having added it. Annnnd... Thank you for making your study free. That's very charitable. I'll gladly contribute when I'll have the means to do so. May God bless you ! I found 3 things that can be improved : 1- Layering order Currently, the Big Prints are drawn on top of the Last Traded Volume. This is in my opinion a mistake. Each time a Big Print is printed, it masks off the Last Traded volume background color. Sometimes there are so much big prints at the price zone, that the Last Traded Volume is invisible for a few seconds. It makes very difficult to follow the price movement. The Last Traded Volume Fill color really needs to be on top of everything else to make it always visible. I feel the same question can be asked about layering order between the Tail and the Big Prints. Maybe creating a new user input would be the best solution to let user decide by themself. 2- The Big Print / Histogram "False Flag". Currently, the Big Print and Histogram features do their calculations based on new recent printed volume (inside the Tail) AND old printed volume (outside the tail). It creates some "False Flag" at both extremities of the tail. There, sometimes a Big Print or a Histogram event is created based only on old volume, not new. This is misleading. Here is a Histogram example in attached files. 2 - 15
In this example, at the top extremity of the tail, 4 - 36, the Histogram triggered a green imbalance.18 - 0 4 - 36 7 - 83 51 - 60 53 - 27 5 - 37 (bold numbers are the recent volume inside the tail) This is true because 36 is the newest print. But at the bottom extremity of the tail, 5 - 37. The market pulled-back and printed only 5 at the Bid before going back up. The 37 was untouched and is old volume outside the Tail. Nevertheless, the Histogram also triggered a green imbalance at this level, even if no Ask Volume was printed at all. This is false because it is based on the 37 which is an old volume outside of the Tail. The same situation can also happens with the Big Print (Delta Imbalances at price) feature. I think every single number outside the tail (old volume) should have a zero value for the Histogram and Big Print calculations. 3- Conditions for deleting a Big Print Currently, if the Best Ask Price or Best Bid Price revisit a Big Print level, it automatically deletes the Big Print event even if the market didn't print any volume at all at this level (it is just a "touch and go"). It might be more logical in that case, to consider that the Big Print level is holding strong, and to not delete it. To delete a Big Print event, the market should print volume on it or go trough it completely. |
 Screenshot 2026-03-26 132858.png / V - Attached On 2026-03-26 15:39:04 UTC - Size: 5.5 KB - 70 views |