Support Board
Date/Time: Sun, 26 Apr 2026 17:18:23 +0000
Post From: Feature Request: Momentum Tails
| [2026-03-19 21:16:41] |
| gcUserStudies - Posts: 143 |
|
Thanks, appreciate the feedback. I have all of these items implemented and am doing final testing now and am planning to push an updated version in the next few days. I've also extended all existing trials until April 6th. When V2 is pushed out you'll have a few more weeks to evaluate it. I also added a better configuration method so the study is easier to set up and manage. This won't break any existing setting either if you have something on the current version you are still testing. It will show up as a second study under the existing. As for your questions: Why would someone want to disable the tail effect? Accuracy relative to the Chart Update Interval? Agreed 100% on the accuracy point. Throughout development I ran a chartbook with at least 7 DOMs simultaneously using the same and varied combine increments, and placed the study in full visible range volume print mode alongside Sierra's native bid/ask columns to verify prints were always in lock step. Testing was done at a 10ms update interval with no issues, primarily on NQ given how actively it moves. That said, I won't claim there's a magic number. If the update interval is set too high it can miss prints. For standard execution DOMs most traders are running, it should be fine. If someone is seeing missed prints, lowering the update interval is the first thing to try. Ie, start higher and go down from there. My other DOM chart I have at 40ms for ES and didn't have any thing missing. What update interval are you running your DOM's at? |