Support Board
Date/Time: Tue, 03 Mar 2026 19:11:02 +0000
Post From: Better control of region's scale when multiple studies in region
| [2026-01-20 18:02:31] |
| n8trading - Posts: 68 |
|
Thanks John. I'd like to add a couple of additional region related pain points. Let me know if you'd prefer I create a new thread, but this is all related and I think this thread helps keep them together and will hopefully lead to a handful of enhancements around regions. To keep things organized, I'll call the first enhancement we already discussed as #1, and the two new ones below are #2 and #3. 2. Region size - If you add a study and put it in a new region, or you remove a study from an existing region (and there could be other scenarios too), the size of your regions get expanded significantly. So any adjustment you had to your region sizes has to be re-done. My suggestion would be to somehow try to maintain the region sizes when making changes to studies/regions. For example, when adding a new region, make the new region's size very small so that it doesn't affect the size of existing region sizes and therefore all you would have to do is adjust the size of the new region instead of having to adjust the size of all regions. 3. Region order - It is tedious to adjust region order. If you have multiple regions (in my case, I often have 8 regions) and multiple studies within each region, I have them setup in a particular order. But say I want to add a new region, and I want to add it in a particular spot (not necessarily at the bottom). So if I have 8 regions, and I want to add another study(ies) to a new region, I might want the new region to be region #4. So intuitively I would move the current bottom region/studies that's in #8 to #9, #7 to #8, etc. But it won't let me do that - it appears a new region cannot be created just by specifying a new region #; If I try to set #9, it will stay at #8 when I Apply/Ok. So I have to add a study to the new region first (this causes issue #1 above to happen). Then, I have to try to start re-ordering regions/studies. You can already see how tedious this can be. So I'm proposing for there to be an easier way to re-order regions and their associated studies. Thank you, |