Support Board
Date/Time: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 14:28:23 +0000
Post From: Upcoming Development and Internal Number Precision Improvement Project
| [2026-01-09 20:32:34] |
| Sierra_Chart Engineering - Posts: 22524 |
|
We are going to remove this thread from the top of the message board. This is not going to be the case anymore after further consideration: All of the above, will cause incompatibility with ACSIL studies and they will need to be recompiled. This will just be a recompile but inevitably there will be warnings that the compiler will generate. Like for example if you are assigning a value from a Subgraph Data array into a four byte float, then there will be a warning about loss of precision. This can be ignored. Generated DLLs will probably have this new suffix appended after these changes _64D rather than _64. D means double. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, use the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
