Support Board

Date/Time: Wed, 15 May 2024 17:30:21 +0000

Post From: Petition to AMP Futures for Cooperation with Sierrachart’s new Teton Order Routing service

[2021-12-20 01:35:59] Link To Thread - Link To Post [Go To First Post]
Sierra Chart Engineering - Posts: 104368
Well, let us see what happens. Let us see about the issues that TT, Rithmic and CQG have or had ( in the past), since we have released our CME order routing and compare to our record. We have a perfect record so far. So that is one reason. Risk management is definitely far more advanced, than CQG. No rejections when flattening a position unless the global order quantity limit is set too low but this is not normally the case. Reliable server-side bracket orders that work properly! They do not work right with CQG. Neither OCO or Bracket orders, work as expected with CQG. There are issues with them. And CQG has no auto liquidation either. Low latency order routing. Long-term order fill history with Position quantity per fill. Zero cost. The entire feature list is here: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, change to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing Date Time Of Last Edit: 2021-12-20 01:36:30