Support Board
Support Board
Search Board
Control Panel
View My Posts / Threads
Direct MessagesDate/Time: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 22:28:44 +0000
Post From: Sierra Chart Does Not Recommend CQG (Various Reasons)
| [2021-02-05 06:57:26] |
| |
|
To give users an idea of how much order flow we currently handle through the Sierra Chart Order Routing Service, for the month of January 2021, we processed 316,000+ individual order fills. So for example, an order with a quantity of 5 which fills results in a fill of 5. The only complaint that we have is with account balances not updating frequently enough and we know about that but that is out of our control for the time being until we have our own direct routing released. And we know this has taken some time. If we did not take so much time on this Support Board that will be have been done by now. We are also adding support for the Position Average Price field on the Trade Orders window and it has been released on Server 5. We will get the rest of the servers updated over the weekend except possibly for Server 2 which we may wait until another week for. If you want reliable server-side bracket orders, which are managed in a super low latency environment, the Sierra Chart Order Routing Service is what you want to use. This is not offered with CQG. For all of the features, refer to: Sierra Chart / Trading Technologies Futures Order Routing Service Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing Date Time Of Last Edit: 2021-02-05 07:00:09
|