Support Board
Support Board
Search Board
Control Panel
View My Posts / Threads
Direct MessagesDate/Time: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 22:49:24 +0000
Post From: Chartbook Charts unnecessarily tagged for full recalculation issue?
| [2020-11-25 07:49:42] |
| User92573 - Posts: 475 |
|
Dear Support I'm experiencing unexpected log entries - and charts tagged for full recalculation? I have noticed that when I update studies, e.g. (show/hide) even a Simple MA on a chart in the chartbook the linked/associated studies (same symbol) are tagged for full recalculation as expected but at the same time many (not all) of the other charts are also being unnecessarily tagged for full recalculation. In most of the cases I have monitored, it is the chart numbers that follow the one being updated that are tagged e.g. show/hide a study on chart #48, tags #48 and above. The same action on chart #1, seems to tag chart #1 and above for full recalculation. This is why I feel there is some form dependency being retained when charts are duplicated? These are different symbols and not linked to the chart being updated. The only two common elements is that they were created using the 'duplicate chart' option in the chart menu and 'apply study collection' >> after which the symbols, links and references where applicable were changed/updated. Could there be a legacy issue or retention of some parameters whereby Sierra Charts believes the link still exists? I have noticed this in the past and rather than deleting all charts/studies and starting again from scratch as I've done previously, is there a solution to remove any unnecessarily retained dependencies? Many thanks Date Time Of Last Edit: 2020-11-25 08:04:18
|