Support Board

Date/Time: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 10:31:13 +0000

Post From: Question: AMP Transaction Fees, TT versus CQG.

[2020-04-27 23:42:15] Link To Thread - Link To Post [Go To First Post]
User752471 - Posts: 14
When we have recommended using the Sierra Chart Order routing service which utilizes TT (Trading Technologies) trading accounts, it was with our understanding that the transaction fees that an AMP customer pays does not change if they are moving from CQG. And you will actually save if you are moving from Rithmic or CTS. Coming from CQG the commissions would be the same, the exchange fees would be the same, and the per contract fee remains at .10. Switched over from CQG to Sierra Chart Order Routing (via TT-fix) in April and can confirm that the RT commission charged is more on the Sierra Chart TT-fix than using CQG order routing. The RT commission on 1 ES mini contract on CQG is $3.70 whereas on the TT-fix it is $4.10 (all billed through AMP). Any plans in the pipeline to get this commission lowered to match that of CQG order routing? Thanks