Login Page - Create Account

Support Board


Date/Time: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 13:02:22 +0000



Post From: Question: AMP Transaction Fees, TT versus CQG.

[2020-01-18 21:22:08]
Sierra Chart Engineering - Posts: 104368
Ok, but can you show us what you were charged previously when using CQG. We will make sure the fees remain the same. We will insist upon this.

There are many good things coming with the TT based order routing. Next month we are going to do a direct cross connect to TT in the Aurora data center to ensure perfectly stable connectivity, under all conditions. We have not had a problem yet, but we just want to safeguard against any future potential problems.

We are also going to add daily loss limit functionality.

And expand our data feed offerings on Denali to cover more exchanges and hopefully be able to include exchanges like JPX futures and US stocks with market depth. Regarding the data feeds, this is a difficult area, and we do not know what the outcome will be but we should have a good sense of this, over the next 60 to 90 days. So this should only be understood as a statement of intention with no guarantees.
Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level

Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy:
https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation

For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service:
Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing
Date Time Of Last Edit: 2020-01-18 21:34:10