Support Board
Support Board
Search Board
Control Panel
View My Posts / Threads
Direct MessagesDate/Time: Tue, 28 May 2024 07:31:07 +0000
Post From: Changing Brokers
| [2018-01-24 04:35:34] |
| |
|
Well if you do not have any problems with Interactive Brokers, then there is not really a reason to change. We do not really think there is a risk. It is more a case of just sometimes some users run into problems but not anything that normally would be creating something which can be viewed as a risk. A frustration yes. We also are going to release an updated interface to TWS which uses the new specification from them which prefixes each message with a length. As a practical matter this will not change anything for users but is a better method of communication. Through Stage 5 would you be using CQG? Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing Date Time Of Last Edit: 2018-01-24 04:36:49
|