Support Board
Support Board
Search Board
Control Panel
View My Posts / Threads
Direct MessagesDate/Time: Thu, 16 May 2024 18:35:09 +0000
Subgraph has different values upon recalculation/addition of additional study
View Count: 923
| [2014-09-09 09:40:48] |
| Leo33 - Posts: 73 |
|
I have a subgraph which provides different values upon a recalculation or the addition of additional study. The recalculation looks more accurate (although I'm speculating on that). > I have several stock charts with VOLUME study added > I then STUDY/PRICE OVERLAY each of the VOLUME subgraphs onto a fresh chart > I then ADD SUBGRAPHS for pairs of the VOLUMES subgraphs [and ADD SUBGRAPHS again ie add pairs and add the added pairs to add say 4 stock volumes into a total volume result for the group of stocks] > To deliver a composite or total volume for the group of stock It is this total volume for the group which delivers different values upon recalulation [they are pretty different not marginal]. Is my process bad for delivering a composite volume for the stock group? Is there a good way of doing it? Why might the recalulation be so different? thanks. Date Time Of Last Edit: 2014-09-09 09:42:18
|
| [2014-09-09 20:49:05] |
| |
|
This is resolvable. You need to change the study calculation order. Refer to Study Calculation Precedence here: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?page=doc/doc_ChartStudies.html#StudyCalculationPrecedence Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing Date Time Of Last Edit: 2014-09-09 20:49:17
|
To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account: