Support Board
Support Board
Search Board
Control Panel
View My Posts / Threads
Direct MessagesDate/Time: Sat, 04 May 2024 01:11:21 +0000
[Locked] - New spreadsheet functionality same performance as the old CLR version?
View Count: 2283
| [2014-08-15 23:12:03] |
| tobi - Posts: 351 |
|
I've been transforming one of my chartbooks, that contains spreadsheet studies from the CLR to the non-CLR version. At first, the performance was very poor. It took very long for the chartbook to load, and working with it was very lagging. Thanks to tomgilb and the new formula expression tree I changed a few formulas that showed errors in the non-CLR version and the performance got a lot better. I still have the feeling, that the performance is yet not the same as in the old CLR version. Maybe you want to have a look at this and check if there are still performance differences and what the reason might be. I've attached the chartbook and spreadsheet file of the non-CLR and the CLR version. I've by purpose left them as they are and have not created a version with just one symbol and a couple of charts. I have been asking for help in the forum, to have most of these spreadsheet studies converted in ACSIL studies. I'm hoping that the performance will be quite a bit better with less spreadsheet studies. Is this assumption true? Thanks for looking into this, tobi Date Time Of Last Edit: 2014-08-16 06:27:11
|
Private File Private File Private File Private File |
| [2014-08-16 00:29:58] |
| |
|
We will see what the performance problem is and work on resolving it.
Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
| [2014-08-16 06:15:56] |
| tobi - Posts: 351 |
|
Thank you for looking into this. I have been asking for help in the forum, to have most of these spreadsheet studies converted in ACSIL studies. I'm hoping that the performance will be quite a bit better with less spreadsheet studies. Is this assumption true? Please comment on this too.
|
| [2014-08-16 11:27:50] |
| |
|
Yes, absolutely. Performance will be much better with ACSIL We do see there is a significant performance issue we need to solve with Spreadsheets still. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
| [2014-08-16 20:28:01] |
| tobi - Posts: 351 |
|
Yes, absolutely. Performance will be much better with ACSIL Ok, so it totally makes sense to have the sudies converted into ACSIL.We do see there is a significant performance issue we need to solve with Spreadsheets still. Please let us know here or in the general new spreadsheet thread when these issues are solved.Thank you very much for your ongoing work to improve SC, tobi |
| [2014-08-17 11:19:28] |
| |
|
The performance issues will gradually be solved.
Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account: