Home >> Support Board

Support Board

Date/Time: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 19:24:46 +0000

How to Post a Message for Support

Web Based Sierra Chart Order Entry (CQG routing)

View Count: 837

[2021-02-18 19:31:57] #1 [Go To First Post]
@TRADE_YOUR_PLAN - Posts: 126
Are Denali users who switched from TT to CQG order routing still able to enter orders through Sierra Chart's web based interface? Perhaps something needs to be reset since for me, the symbols loaded still suggest TT symbols (ESH21_FUT_CME etc.). This is important since CQG routing does not support SERVER side held bracket (attached) orders and I would like a means to cancel them myself (without having to contact AMP) in the event of a local client interruption of data (power outage, ISP interruption etc.). Thanks

[2021-02-18 20:05:16] #2 [Go To First Post]
John - SC Support - Posts: 31159
1. No. The web-based interface is not setup to work with CQG. 2. Select Edit >> Translate Symbols to Current Service For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, use the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing

[2021-02-18 20:12:08] #3 [Go To First Post]
@TRADE_YOUR_PLAN - Posts: 126
I'm referring to the symbols loaded in the web interface. I've got CQG routing up and running on SC as per generic instructions. Would deeply appreciate the web-based interface getting setup for CQG routing soon due to reasons outlined above. Thanks John. Actually, apparently I can download a CQG app and manage orders from there... I'll have to check that out. Edit: confirmed. The CQG mobile app is quite good. I'm looking forward to CQG FIX, which will have server side bracket orders as per Sierra Chart Engineering. This is a GOOD solution, as TTFIX had no mobile solution except Sierra's rudimentary web interface, which I appreciated, but was definitely behind the times. Thanks again. Date Time Of Last Edit: 2021-02-18 20:31:47

[2021-02-18 21:05:18] #4 [Go To First Post]
theunknowntrader - Posts: 112
Is CQG routing slower than TT?

[2021-02-18 21:08:05] #5 [Go To First Post]
Sierra Chart Engineering - Posts: 104368
Support for the web-based trading will be coming later with the Sierra Chart order routing service supporting CQG. Is CQG routing slower than TT? We do not know. We have heard that what we offer with the Sierra Chart order routing service is faster but we do not have any direct knowledge of that. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, change to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing

[2021-02-18 21:10:24] #6 [Go To First Post]
theunknowntrader - Posts: 112
Yeah, i noticed. Maybe Rithmic routing is faster than CQG routing

[2021-02-18 21:10:57] #7 [Go To First Post]
theunknowntrader - Posts: 112
this situation really sucks, i tested 1 ES, and the P&L was moving very slow. charts also

[2021-02-18 21:11:34] #8 [Go To First Post]
theunknowntrader - Posts: 112
Sierra, I am loyal to you guys I hope you help us loyal customers have the best solution in hands.

[2021-02-18 21:43:50] #9 [Go To First Post]
@TRADE_YOUR_PLAN - Posts: 126
Support for the web-based trading will be coming later with the Sierra Chart order routing service supporting CQG. CQG has a very nice app for users with a CQG login. It is very current in design and user friendly. The only potential advantage I see in SC creating the web-based trading later with CQG FIX implementation is allowing concurrent connections. But even then, in the case of emergency order management, I'd prefer to use CQG's app. Just pointing it out as it could save SC valuable engineering time, time that could be spent better on other projects. :) Edit: apologies, unless I'm using their data plan, it is not a good solution since the app requires data to work in real-time. However, it does give me order history, margins etc.. And I plan on using Denali for data. Sierra Chart's web-based order entry is still a must for users using Denali (data) and CQG (routing). Edit 2: CQG's app actually does allow me to close open positions easily. Initially, when I entered orders from Sierra Chart, the orders weren't showing up in CQG's app (both unfilled and filled orders). I've been testing this, and they now are showing up immediately in CQG's app. The CQG app is now a perfectly good solution to having access to orders in emergency situations. Date Time Of Last Edit: 2021-02-19 05:33:16

[2021-02-18 21:46:05] #10 [Go To First Post]
theunknowntrader - Posts: 112
CQG is slow as fuck

[2021-02-18 22:15:24] #11 [Go To First Post]
Sierra Chart Engineering - Posts: 104368
CQG cannot be that slow. Maybe there is some other cause. Would be good to refer to this information: Overview of Trading: Sierra Chart Configuration for Most Low Response Time Trading Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, change to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing

[2021-02-19 00:08:44] #12 [Go To First Post]
Sierra Chart Engineering - Posts: 104368
As we said CQG cannot be that slow. Check the Chart Update Interval setting: Chart Settings: Chart Update Interval in Milliseconds (Chart >> Chart Settings >> Display >> Chart Update Interval menu) And there may also be better performance once we use the direct CQG FIX connection when we have that set up through the Sierra Chart Order Routing Service. We have suspected/wondered if the Web API configuration, may create additional overhead/delays. But we really do not know. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, change to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing

[2021-02-19 00:41:38] #13 [Go To First Post]
theunknowntrader - Posts: 112
not that, i didnt touch anything

To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account: