Home >> Support Board

Support Board

Date/Time: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 09:34:15 +0000

How to Post a Message for Support

[User Discussion] - Depthbars values vs spreadsheet calculation discrepancy

View Count: 981

[2019-08-19 12:33:35] #1 [Go To First Post]
User132748 - Posts: 159
Theres a big discrepancy when using Depthbars study values for calculation using Spreadsheet formula study. Please see attached screen. There are only 2 studies: depthbars study and simple bar formula study replicating candles from depthbars study. You can see many candles look very different vs original study candles. If I reload chart (Ins key) all spreadsheet study candles are recalculated and look excatly the same as depthbars study. There was no such issue in your previous implementation. Spreadsheet formula had always excatly same values as original study all the time. Seems like Depthbars study has lower calculation precedence than spreadsheet study and has value updates AFTER spreadsheet study was calculated thats why spreadsheet study has no access to recent values. Date Time Of Last Edit: 2019-08-19 13:23:48


depthbarsvsspread.jpg / V - Attached On 2019-08-19 12:20:36 UTC - Size: 224.85 KB - 241 views

[2019-08-19 23:01:19] #2 [Go To First Post]
User132748 - Posts: 159
I see post status changed to user discussion. I dont need any discussion. I need your comment if that behaviour is wrong or it will stay that way and why?

[2019-08-20 20:17:39] #3 [Go To First Post]
User132748 - Posts: 159
Could you explain what is the reason of this situation? How can we trust spreadsheet formula study?? It's not something about datafeed quality, CQG, or depthbars in general. The problem is that spreadsheet formula study which has lowest calculation precedence doesn't have the same values as Depthbars study above. What is the reason of that discrepancy? Thanks

To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account: