Support Board
Support Board
Search Board
Control Panel
View My Posts / Threads
Direct MessagesDate/Time: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 09:34:55 +0000
Feature Request – more access to the Study Settings/Alerts inputs from ASCIL
View Count: 568
| [2019-04-29 16:52:32] |
| jesslinn - Posts: 108 |
|
It would be very useful if ASCIL had full access to the alert configuration settings. It seems that as of 1898 the access is: enabled – read-write (AlertCondtionEnabled) reset alert condition on new bar – read-write (ResetAlertOnNewBar) alert only once per bar – read-write (AlertOnlyOncePerBar) Evaluate On Bar Close – not available Use Full Precision When Evaluating Alert Formula – not available Log Evaluated Formula at Each Evaluation – not available Alert – read-only (SelectedAlertSound) Alert Condition Flags – read-only In particular, in order of my desires, could the following be added?: Alert Condition – read-write access to the string – AlertFormula Evaluate On Bar Close – read-write access Log Evaluated Formula – read-write access The primary use case is to make use of the configuration to configure, validate, and inform while keeping control of the alert evaluation. |
| [2019-04-30 05:08:31] |
| |
|
One solution is to use this function: double sc.EvaluateGivenAlertConditionFormulaAsDouble(int BarIndex, int ParseAndSetFormula, const SCString& Formula); This will give you complete control relating to what you want. Make sure you are running the current version. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing Date Time Of Last Edit: 2019-04-30 05:08:52
|
| [2019-04-30 10:03:37] |
| jesslinn - Posts: 108 |
|
No. I am aware of the new Evaluate formulae, although I am not clear what advantage parsing a string is over normal ASCIL evaluation unless one can actually read the string from the user. What I am seeking is better communication with the user without having to create inputs for alert checkboxes that already exist and more importantly, to be able to read and display the condition string, which would be difficult to enter or read in a small string input box. Thanks. |
To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account: