Support Board
Support Board
Search Board
Control Panel
View My Posts / Threads
Direct MessagesDate/Time: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 19:02:45 +0000
depth question on new update 1911
View Count: 4310
| [2019-04-28 17:29:02] |
| User209218 - Posts: 34 |
|
Like Sundownded and Eslavio, I have been using an older version to better use this feature. At this time, I am unable to update to the current version to correct some disconnect issues I have been having that I understand have been dealt with starting with ver 1906. You have a very complete and usable product, please seriously consider the changes suggested by HKC 01. Thanks
|
| [2019-04-28 17:38:33] |
| User873130 - Posts: 44 |
|
Please, implement this feature discussed above
|
| [2019-04-28 17:51:32] |
| User729038 - Posts: 4 |
|
+1 HKC01 That sounds like a great solution! Thanks for putting this together.
|
| [2019-04-28 18:17:38] |
| User20450 - Posts: 330 |
|
100% , thank you hkc01 for laying it out like that
|
| [2019-04-28 18:59:29] |
| User450950 - Posts: 9 |
|
+1
|
| [2019-04-28 19:00:22] |
| Tooth Fairy - Posts: 79 |
|
Thanks HKC01 for a nice write up & proposal prescribed the exact reason why I still stick w/ an old version predated 1870. With a talented team SC has put together, it would be a simple change if a proper structure has been in place.
|
| [2019-04-28 19:22:03] |
| 77sx7 - Posts: 16 |
|
Interesting. I see where you are coming from.
|
| [2019-04-28 19:44:09] |
| User935626 - Posts: 7 |
|
Exactly I don't upgrade precisely for this reason, great suggestions, love SC team awesome platform.
|
| [2019-04-28 20:29:40] |
| User993113 - Posts: 71 |
|
+1 HKC01
|
| [2019-04-28 20:35:20] |
| 02108 - Posts: 27 |
|
+1 HKC01
|
| [2019-04-28 23:30:52] |
| user9990910 - Posts: 15 |
|
+1
|
| [2019-04-29 05:49:14] |
| User626318 - Posts: 9 |
|
+1
|
| [2019-04-29 09:03:28] |
| oicur12 - Posts: 17 |
|
Excellent suggestion by HKC01. I also have reverted back to older versions because of this issue. Thank you in advance to the SC team for supporting this, you are the best!
|
| [2019-04-29 11:55:08] |
| User707191 - Posts: 5 |
|
Great suggestion HKC01! Would love to see this implemented as it makes the depth easier to read.
|
| [2019-04-29 12:10:01] |
| Acro - Posts: 436 |
|
+1 for HKC01. Brilliant suggestion. SC, you have no idea how much time we individual traders waste with multiple implementations of the current study trying to get an accurate representation of a heatmap and that it's the one thing making us want to fire up Bookmap from time to time |
| [2019-04-29 12:24:40] |
| samual sprat - Posts: 343 |
|
+1 for HKC01! Sounds perfect. Please can you implement Sierra?
|
| [2019-04-29 12:30:40] |
| User915027 - Posts: 17 |
|
+1 HKC01
|
| [2019-04-29 12:57:53] |
| User138602 - Posts: 169 |
|
But then lets also get this MDHG-study an option to scale automatically based on the highest liquidity in the loaded chart. This way you always get the brightest range3 color for max liquidity, no matter if max liquidity is 1100 contracts or 300. This is usefull for switching symbols. Otherwise you always have to adjust the study settings manually.
|
| [2019-04-29 17:06:59] |
| User652601 - Posts: 1 |
|
From here I would have requested the same thing. Thanks for doing it for me! Very good question
|
| [2019-04-29 17:08:33] |
| nosast2 - Posts: 73 |
|
+1
|
| [2019-04-29 17:09:04] |
| User110227 - Posts: 2 |
|
+1 HKC01
|
| [2019-04-29 17:20:54] |
| User20450 - Posts: 330 |
|
correct so the largest order on the book should determine the highest number for the % to be between , so this 1049 on the offer will be the darkest color on the map and the rest of the orders are colored in there percentages to this max order
|
Attachment Deleted. Private File |
| [2019-04-29 19:15:56] |
| User502498 - Posts: 33 |
|
+1 PLEASE. It's the only reason I still use and pay for bookmap. I have 5 MDH studies running at one time and seperate chart books for each underlying like CL and ES due to the different liquidity profiles and the manual values I need to implement.
|
| [2019-04-29 19:22:27] |
| User138602 - Posts: 169 |
|
yeah but there is also a problem: it only works if you have a general liquidity max value. Today i saw in ES over 2k contract normaly the max is around 900-1.1k. When you have these 2k loaded in the chart...1k would not get the range 3 color. might be something to consider. how does bookmap do this? they state that they use an algorithm for it. EDIT: This is already taken care of with "Maximum Quantity For Coloring". Date Time Of Last Edit: 2019-05-18 11:17:37
|
| [2019-04-29 19:42:14] |
| User839162 - Posts: 82 |
|
+1 for this change! What about displaying it like this? 90% - 100% ASK DEPTH Color | min color | max color | 80% - 90% ASK DEPTH Color | min color | max color | 70% - 80% ASK DEPTH Color | min color | max color | 60% - 70% ASK DEPTH Color | min color | max color | 50% - 60% ASK DEPTH Color | min color | max color | 40% - 50% ASK DEPTH Color | min color | max color | 30% - 40% ASK DEPTH Color | min color | max color | 20% - 30% ASK DEPTH Color | min color | max color | 10% - 20% ASK DEPTH Color | min color | max color | 0% - 10% ASK DEPTH Color | min color | max color | 0% - 10% BID DEPTH Color | min color | max color | 10% - 20% BID DEPTH Color | min color | max color | 20% - 30% BID DEPTH Color | min color | max color | 30% - 40% BID DEPTH Color | min color | max color | 40% - 50% BID DEPTH Color | min color | max color | 50% - 60% BID DEPTH Color | min color | max color | 60% - 70% BID DEPTH Color | min color | max color | 70% - 80% BID DEPTH Color | min color | max color | 80% - 90% BID DEPTH Color | min color | max color | 90% - 100% BID DEPTH Color | min color | max color | Date Time Of Last Edit: 2019-04-29 21:03:44
|
| [2019-04-29 21:51:14] |
| User700573 - Posts: 13 |
|
Wholeheartedly join in HKCO1's request! Thank you Sierra engineers for considering this simple fix
|
To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account: