Support Board
Support Board
Search Board
Control Panel
View My Posts / Threads
Direct MessagesDate/Time: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 00:29:05 +0000
Unmatched fills in ACSIL with SC version 1039
View Count: 1886
| [2013-10-29 21:24:56] |
| Viacheslav Malafeev - Posts: 88 |
|
Hi, As soon as I upgraded to version 1039, all my ACSIL systems started giving me UNMATCHED FILLS with every order they submit. Proof: 1. http://screencast.com/t/wSRZzUDY17P - TAL 2. http://screencast.com/t/9SjvXDW9v - chart Obviously, this help arcticle http://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=doc/doc_TradeActivityLog.php#TradesTabUnmatchedFill is of no help here. I think that something was done to TAL between versions 1032 and 1039 that it has this bug now. The other bug which appeared in version 1039 is the bold font in Trade Statistics Tab. Thank you! |
| [2013-10-30 00:09:07] |
| xfighter - Posts: 36 |
|
I have the same issue here. My ACSIL codes track the internalposition data and then open or close my position accordingly. Now it seems that the sc.GetTradePosition can no longer get the info of intenalposition so my auto trading systems keep thinking there is no position being opened, and keep sending the same order again and again, and never close a postion because they see no internalposition there. Please give us some instruction on this issue. Thank you!
|
| [2013-10-30 00:58:10] |
| |
|
This issue has been tracked down and it relates only to a bar based back test. It has been resolved and we are going to be releasing a new version in about two hours. It did not affect live trading and could not have because the way that positions are tracked for live trading is completely different compared to simulated trading. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
| [2013-11-27 16:02:33] |
| Thanakha - Posts: 1 |
|
Hi, I have still non correlation between Back Test and Live. With the same Automated Trading System, after Live cession, I launch the Back Test for the same period and the results are different. I feel very desappointed because this back test seems to be useless. |
| [2013-11-29 07:00:02] |
| |
|
It is very hard for us to comment on this without very close examination of an automated trading system and this is not something that is within the scope of our support. We do have this documentation on this particular subject: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=doc/doc_Backtesting.php#DifferencesBackTestRealTime Does your trading system make reference to data on other charts? Or just a single chart. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account: