Support Board
Support Board
Search Board
Control Panel
View My Posts / Threads
Direct MessagesDate/Time: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 13:43:59 +0000
Client Side vs Server Side Orders Question
View Count: 1654
| [2018-06-10 05:01:26] |
| User513662 - Posts: 90 |
|
Hi, For anyone out there, or SC Support if this falls within the scope of support, having read through the documentation here http://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=doc/AttachedOrders.html#AttachedOrdersInLiveEnvironment I can see two benefits of using server side vs client for order management; 1.In the case of placing an order then losing client internet connection the stop and limit are still placed when the parent order is filled (whilst the client still being disconnected) because the child orders are held with the trading service, waiting for confirmation the parent has been filled. 2.Reduced latency. Because the child stop and target orders are held with the trading service on their server (which is assumed to be collocated with the exchange), once the parent fills there is minimal latency for the placement of the stop (for somewhat increased protection) and target limit (better position in queue). Are there any other benefits I am missing here? Many thanks. |
| [2018-06-11 17:07:19] |
| |
|
1. Yes this is correct. 2. Yes this is correct. There really are no other benefits. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
| [2018-06-11 23:22:32] |
| User513662 - Posts: 90 |
|
Thank you for your response.
|
To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account: