Home >> Support Board

Support Board

Date/Time: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 13:18:24 +0000

How to Post a Message for Support

Bug with write bar and study data to file

View Count: 884

[2018-02-09 09:50:32] #1 [Go To First Post]
User942837 - Posts: 108
I spent quite some time on this issue and noticed that when my sierra version is above 1674, this study no longer works as expected. In fact, the output columns in the text file do not match the data. I tried to figure out what the extra data is but couldn't figure it out. When I rollback to version 1674 the columns in the text file match the data exported. Can you kindly look at why this is happening and fix it please? The studies I am exporting are the following but I think the issue is not specific to these studies: Pivots Variable Period, Volume Value Area Lines, Relative volume, Moving average and Color Bar Study thank you

[2018-02-09 09:57:10] #2 [Go To First Post]
Sierra Chart Engineering - Posts: 104368
The issue is actually the opposite. There was a problem that was recently fixed with this study. So what you are seeing in the latest versions is correct. Precisely explain why you think it is not. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, change to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing

[2018-02-09 10:34:44] #3 [Go To First Post]
User942837 - Posts: 108
I am copying the first 3 lines extracted from different versions of sierra (Latest) and 1674. In the first example, there are some values which I have no idea what they are, that are being exported and the output does not match the column numbers. On Sierra versions <1674, I never have encountered this issue. WRONG (Latest Version) Date, Time, Open, High, Low, Last, Vol POC, Vol Value Area High, Vol Value Area Low, Color Bar, HLC, Relative Volume, Cumulative Volume Ratio, 100%, Ask Trades, Bid Trades, Vol Ratio Avg, BAZeroLine, Difference, Volume 2015/5/18, 00:00:00.0, 2059.50, 2061.00, 2057.50, 2058.50, 4034, 1773, 2059.13, 2059.00, 2059.25, 1941, 2093, 2058.50, 2059.00, 2057.75, 0.00, 2059.00, 0.0, 0.0, 100.0, 944, 829, 3.768, 0.000, 152, 4034 2015/5/18, 01:00:00.0, 2058.50, 2059.00, 2057.75, 2058.00, 1003, 429, 2058.31, 2058.25, 2058.38, 572, 431, 2058.50, 2058.75, 2058.25, 0.00, 2058.25, 0.0, 0.0, 100.0, 188, 241, -8.116, 0.000, -141, 1003 RIGHT (Sierra 1674) Date, Time, Open, High, Low, Last, Vol POC, Vol Value Area High, Vol Value Area Low, Color Bar, HLC, Relative Volume, Cumulative Volume Ratio, 100%, Ask Trades, Bid Trades, Vol Ratio Avg, BAZeroLine, Difference, Volume 2015/5/18, 00:00:00.0, 2059.50, 2061.00, 2057.50, 2058.50, 2058.50, 2059.00, 2057.75, 0.00, 2059.00, 0.0, 0.0, 100.0, 944, 829, 3.768, 0.000, 152, 4034 2015/5/18, 01:00:00.0, 2058.50, 2059.00, 2057.75, 2058.00, 2058.50, 2058.75, 2058.25, 0.00, 2058.25, 0.0, 0.0, 100.0, 188, 241, -8.116, 0.000, -141, 1003

[2018-02-09 19:44:52] #4 [Go To First Post]
Sierra Chart Engineering - Posts: 104368
We are checking on this. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, change to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing

[2018-02-09 20:55:44] #5 [Go To First Post]
Sierra Chart Engineering - Posts: 104368
OK we see the problem. It relates to the fields for the base graph in the chart. This is resolved. We will have a new release out later today or tomorrow. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, change to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing

[2018-02-13 00:13:19] #6 [Go To First Post]
User45989 - Posts: 54
I am seeing this as well on 1697.

[2018-02-13 03:11:27] #7 [Go To First Post]
Sierra Chart Engineering - Posts: 104368
We have released prerelease 1700. Use this version. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, change to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing

[2018-02-13 07:22:04] #8 [Go To First Post]
User942837 - Posts: 108
thanks I will. version 1699 seems to have fixed the issue.

[2018-02-13 12:06:54] #9 [Go To First Post]
User45989 - Posts: 54
Prerelease 1700 does not fix this for me 1697 Date, Time, Open, High, Low, Last, Volume, RTHOpen, RTHHigh, RTHLow, RTHClose, RTHMID, CumDelta, VPOC, VAH, VAL, VWAP, RTHFrcPrice, RTHFrcLength, RTHFrcVolume, RTHFrcMID, ETHFrcPrice, ETHFrcLength, ETHFrcVolume, ETHFrcMID, VPOC_Close, VAH_Close, VAL_Close, IBHigh, IBLow, RTHZZPrice, RTHZZLength, RTHZZVolume, RTHZZMID, ETHZZPrice, ETHZZLength, ETHZZVolume, ETHZZMID 2018/2/4, 18:00:00.0, 2757.00, 2757.00, 2741.00, 2745.25, 8971, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, -3783, 2757.00, 2757.00, 2748.50, 2751.27, 0.00, 0.00, 31177.00, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 8971.00, 0.00, 2739.00, 2762.50, 2686.00, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 31177.00, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 8971.00, 0.00 1700 Date, Time, Open, High, Low, Last, Volume, # of Trades, OHLC Avg, HLC Avg, HL Avg, Bid Volume, Ask Volume, Volume, RTHOpen, RTHHigh, RTHLow, RTHClose, RTHMID, CumDelta, VPOC, VAH, VAL, VWAP, RTHFrcPrice, RTHFrcLength, RTHFrcVolume, RTHFrcMID, ETHFrcPrice, ETHFrcLength, ETHFrcVolume, ETHFrcMID, VPOC_Close, VAH_Close, VAL_Close, IBHigh, IBLow, RTHZZPrice, RTHZZLength, RTHZZVolume, RTHZZMID, ETHZZPrice, ETHZZLength, ETHZZVolume, ETHZZMID 2018/2/4, 18:00:00.0, 2757.00, 2757.00, 2741.00, 2745.25, 8971, 3123, 2750.06, 2747.75, 2749.00, 6377, 2594, 8971, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, -3783, 2757.00, 2757.00, 2748.50, 2751.27, 0.00, 0.00, 31177.00, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 8971.00, 0.00, 2739.00, 2762.50, 2686.00, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 31177.00, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, 8971.00, 0.00

[2018-02-13 12:57:35] #10 [Go To First Post]
User942837 - Posts: 108
1700 seems fine on mine! Even your output looks correct on both versions. Why are you saying it is not right. You have the same amount of columns and values. Date Time Of Last Edit: 2018-02-13 13:00:04

[2018-02-13 16:20:28] #11 [Go To First Post]
User45989 - Posts: 54
1697 has 38 values 1700 has 45 values EDIT: It appears that 1700 adds columns that the previous versions did not? (# of Trades, OHLC Avg, HLC Avg, HL Avg, Bid Volume, Ask Volume, Volume) Date Time Of Last Edit: 2018-02-13 16:26:01

[2018-02-13 17:11:12] #12 [Go To First Post]
User942837 - Posts: 108
Yes ok... But the amount of columns in the data rows is the same

[2018-02-13 18:41:53] #13 [Go To First Post]
Sierra Chart Engineering - Posts: 104368
EDIT: It appears that 1700 adds columns that the previous versions did not? (# of Trades, OHLC Avg, HLC Avg, HL Avg, Bid Volume, Ask Volume, Volume) Yes that is the difference. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, change to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing

[2018-02-13 19:20:22] #14 [Go To First Post]
User942837 - Posts: 108
yes but that was not the original issue that was reported. that is not an issue.

[2018-02-13 19:30:00] #15 [Go To First Post]
User45989 - Posts: 54
yes but that was not the original issue that was reported. that is not an issue. you are correct - it was confusing (to both me and to my SQL server) to have the additional columns unexpectedly added. I assumed that it was just additional fields based on your original post.

To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account: