Support Board
Support Board
Search Board
Control Panel
View My Posts / Threads
Direct MessagesDate/Time: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 17:56:50 +0000
[Programming Help] - Arithmetic Studies similar to the Relative volume study
View Count: 1189
| [2017-05-29 19:42:42] |
| Neo - Posts: 198 |
|
Is it within the scope of ACSIL to create Arithmetic Studies that calculate cumulative subgraph values to time over X days? So you could examine at each time stamp how much % a subgraph has done of its prior days average over x days. Or a study that calculated the relative time values of a subgraph, so the subgraph value at 9:30 of the current day, was compared against the average of the previous days subgraph values at 9:30. Or a study that calculated the prior days average subgraph values at the equivalent time. eg -CurrentDayCumulativeSubgraphToTime / PriorDayAverageCumulativeSubgraphToTime -CurrentDaySubgraphAtTime/ PriorDayAverageSubgraphAtEquivalentTime -PriorDayAverageSubgraphAtEquivalentTime I'm not requesting this, I'm just asking if either is possible. Date Time Of Last Edit: 2017-05-29 19:44:00
|
| [2017-05-29 20:38:25] |
| |
|
Yes this can certainly be done.
Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
| [2017-05-30 00:14:32] |
| Neo - Posts: 198 |
|
Could this all be built into one study, so there were subgraphs outputted for each calculation that displayed Relative/ Cumulative/ Average? Or would individual studies need to be created for each?
|
| [2017-06-01 19:14:07] |
| |
|
We apologize for the delay. We were just thinking about whether we should put together some documentation for this. You can use one study, so long as all of those calculations have values which can be displayed within a single Chart Region without affecting the scale of each of the others. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
| [2017-06-01 22:29:51] |
| Neo - Posts: 198 |
|
I will be having this study created, so any additional documentation would be much appreciated.
|
| [2017-06-01 23:57:06] |
| |
|
If someone is going to create this for you, they are not going to need any additional documentation. Nothing we would add would be of any use to them. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing Date Time Of Last Edit: 2017-06-01 23:57:25
|
| [2017-06-07 06:31:43] |
| Neo - Posts: 198 |
|
I've had this created, the logic replicates the Relative volume study, except it, calculates based on any subgraph reference. My dev seemed to do it with "Relative" ease. Very powerful study IMO.
|
To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account: