Support Board
Date/Time: Wed, 07 May 2025 19:30:22 +0000
bars vs. chart replay in backtesting
View Count: 1649
[2013-07-16 22:42:59] |
User20851 - Posts: 9 |
Hello, I am getting quite different results from the two methods of backtesting--by bar and chart replay. Testing by bar indicates profit of $48,000 while testing by replaying the chart indicates a loss of $20,000 in the same time period. Does it seem normal that such a disparity should be recorded, and which results are more representative of reality? I understand the replay is said to be the more accurate approach but noticed that backtesting by bars took much longer (about 10 times longer). Any feedback is welcome. Thanks. |
[2013-07-17 00:31:57] |
|
Replay back testing will be more accurate. So you are saying replay back testing was faster than bar based back testing? That would seem unlikely.
Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account: