Support Board
Date/Time: Wed, 10 Dec 2025 06:17:39 +0000
Bar Numbering
View Count: 818
| [2016-05-21 17:49:16] |
| mkata - Posts: 103 |
|
There is a slight inaccuracy present on the current CLN6 contract when using the Bar Numbering Study with a 1_range or 1_tick chart with the start time set at 18:00:00. Please see attached from 5-19-2016. |
 CLN6 0.01 Range .png / V - Attached On 2016-05-21 17:45:45 UTC - Size: 41.57 KB - 300 views CLN6 1 Trades .png / V - Attached On 2016-05-21 17:45:55 UTC - Size: 30.17 KB - 319 views |
| [2016-05-21 22:23:28] |
| mkata - Posts: 103 |
|
I think I solved the problem by changing the code from SCDateTime to SCDateTimeMS.
|
| [2016-05-22 00:15:34] |
| |
|
Interesting, OK we understand the nature of the problem. That solution appears to be correct. We will look at this carefully and implement the appropriate solution. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account: