Support Board
Date/Time: Sun, 12 Apr 2026 07:10:34 +0000
TPO singles area value label position erratic
View Count: 178
| [2026-02-24 13:59:29] |
| User512353 - Posts: 131 |
|
SC2882 TPO chart with chart study setting for Singles Extension Line (SG31) set to Visible, Solid, Size 2, Vale Label: Left, Below and Study Settings Extend Singles: Until Future Intersection Extend Singles as Area: Yes produces inconsistent placing of the value label. Sometimes the value label is at the top of the area, sometimes at the bottom (see attached screenshot). I would expect this to always be placed below the area, consistent with the setting. I would also suggest an enhancement: When Extend as Area = Yes, optionally have labels placed above AND below the area, marking the high and low value of the area. |
| |
| [2026-02-24 22:49:27] |
| Sierra_Chart Engineering - Posts: 23486 |
|
We will check on this.
Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, use the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
| [2026-02-25 13:58:22] |
| User512353 - Posts: 131 |
|
I also want to point out another issue: When singles are "extended until future intersection", and the future intersection is staged over several profile time periods, it appears that the singles get erased for the part that is already intersected - at least while part of the singles are not yet intersected (see attached screenshot). Maybe today's session will take out the singles completely, and we will then see if they reappear. But IMHO what we currently see is not what should be expected. I would expect the singles area cut off in steps. |
| |
| [2026-02-25 14:16:30] |
| User512353 - Posts: 131 |
|
update: as the singles have been taken out, only the "last" part of the singles remains visible. The parts of the singles area that have been taken out in prior periods are deleted. This is not good, as it distorts the significance of the singles area - very prominently shown in the screenshot. |
| |
| [2026-02-26 14:06:21] |
| Sierra_Chart Engineering - Posts: 23486 |
|
We are checking on this.
Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, use the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
| [2026-02-26 21:34:11] |
| Sierra_Chart Engineering - Posts: 23486 |
|
Regarding this, this is by design: as the singles have been taken out, only the "last" part of the singles remains visible. The parts of the singles area that have been taken out in prior periods are deleted. This is not good, as it distorts the significance of the singles area - very prominently shown in the screenshot. When singles are "extended until future intersection", and the future intersection is staged over several profile time periods, it appears that the singles get erased for the part that is already intersected
Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, use the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing Date Time Of Last Edit: 2026-02-26 21:35:32
|
To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account:
