Support Board
Date/Time: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 10:25:46 +0000
Study Subgraphs Reference showing wrong values
View Count: 167
[2025-07-04 13:29:15] |
TopGunTrader - Posts: 213 |
Hi, I have found this before so never used it due to inaccuracies. I've created two statistical numbers based on past days volatility and when I combine them to fill in background it fills in different levels. This pic illustrates the problem and I included a one chart workspace to see for yourself. I'd like to fill in the values but for illustrative purposes used a dot for the study subgraphs study. I've never used this study as I've found it often gives wrong values as this illustrates. |
![]() ![]() |
[2025-07-04 13:33:23] |
TopGunTrader - Posts: 213 |
Oddly enough when I closed the new workspace and went back to original it is NOW showing correct values but initially didn't. I've seen this many many times in the past maybe when first created it has BS values but later on some kind of reset it may work. VERY ODD there is definitely an issue with this study like I said have seen this a half dozen times not work so never used it.
|
[2025-07-04 13:38:17] |
TopGunTrader - Posts: 213 |
I added another spreadsheet formula to the chart and it went back to NOT working.
|
[2025-07-07 15:15:34] |
John - SC Support - Posts: 41464 |
The Scale of the "Study Subgraphs Reference" is set to "Independent" by default. It sounds like you want this to be "Automatic" or "Same as Region". Refer to the following: Chart Scale and Scale Adjusting: Automatic (Scale Range) Chart Scale and Scale Adjusting: Same As Region (Scale Range) For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, use the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account: