Support Board
Date/Time: Sat, 25 Jul 2026 20:20:33 +0000
Post From: ACSIL sc.CancelOrder() on Attached Target OCO Sibling-Linked-Order Cancellation Behavior
| [2026-07-25 17:45:04] |
| Userneshkito - Posts: 4 |
|
Thank you. We understand that cancellation propagates to other working orders only when they are linked through a shared nonzero Link ID. We need clarification on one specific case: An attached Target order and its Stop order are OCO siblings, but both have Link ID = 0. If ACSIL explicitly calls sc.CancelOrder() on the working Target order, will Sierra Chart also cancel its attached OCO sibling Stop order? In other words, does explicit cancellation of one attached OCO order cancel its sibling independently of the Link ID, or does the sibling remain working when both Link IDs are 0? Please answer specifically: Target canceled → Stop remains working; or Target canceled → OCO sibling Stop is also canceled. This concerns explicit cancellation through sc.CancelOrder(), not a Target fill. |