Support Board
Date/Time: Sat, 06 Dec 2025 22:58:53 +0000
Post From: What is the compelling reason for the spreadsheet studies Version 2?
| [2025-12-06 21:22:37] |
| Sierra_Chart Engineering - Posts: 21694 |
|
This is an argumentative post, and we take an exceptionally strong position against not making changes to keep Sierra Chart well organized and clean. If we are following this kind nonsense philosophy of not making improvements, with organization and cleanliness and always working to improve the code base, with performance and organize it better, Sierra Chart gradually would become a mess. We are not going to allow that under any circumstances. Version 2 is well-organized, and all of the fields are included across, all three versions of the Spreadsheet study, unless ones that are trading Inputs and are provided only for the Trading version of the spreadsheet study. This is final and we do not want to hear anything further about it. It is left as an option and we do apologize for the cases where it was inadvertently enabled. This has long been solved by now. And we do not believe in the ain't broke don't fix it mentality. That is a terrible mentality especially in the realm of software engineering. Most software in the world, is very substandard. We are going to be the best, and excel at what we do. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, use the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing Date Time Of Last Edit: 2025-12-06 21:44:45
|