Support Board
Support Board
Search Board
Control Panel
View My Posts / Threads
Direct MessagesDate/Time: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 20:05:11 +0000
Post From: Move to breakeven for stop
| [2014-07-29 01:25:02] |
| |
|
While we are happy to offer this functionality and generally it works well, it is this kind of problem that we see from IB which is the reason why we hesitate adding this functionality to begin with. This does not mean server-side bracket orders are not reliable. They are. We are going to be adding them for CTS T4 and also CQG and other services. Essentially what we see with the behavior in the test we did now is completely nonsensical behavior, on the IB side, which renders the future useless in this test. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |