Support Board
Date/Time: Tue, 20 May 2025 20:53:55 +0000
Post From: [shared] persistent variables vs study inputs vs direct sc methods (for 2+ studies)
| [2023-12-21 15:48:03] |
| User133994 - Posts: 81 |
|
Well, I wrote a custom solution using a flat file using ACSIL Interface Members - Functions: sc.OpenFile() and the other file commands with SC. And....it worked? Performance is perfect. I see the change with my eyes the same time the 2nd chart sees it. Now, I'm really confused as to why I can write a flat file and have better performance sharing state information between 2 studies and 2 charts? I must really be missing something or am using the shared persistent variables wrong? Nonetheless...I'll read any responses. For now, flat file is the way to go; I'm abandoning persistent variables in favor of a flat file for this part of the design (and likely any future parts). No, I'm not writing arrays to the flat file, just state information for various bot algorithms I have. So the data requirements aren't huge like it would be for saving an array. Any comments welcome. Thanks |