Support Board
Support Board
Search Board
Control Panel
View My Posts / Threads
Direct MessagesDate/Time: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 13:23:42 +0000
Post From: Smoothed MA in ACSIL differs significantly from study
| [2021-07-18 23:31:00] |
| skellington - Posts: 14 |
|
Hi, I am computing the smoothed MA in my ACSIL study using any of the three following options: sc.SmoothedMovingAverage(sc.Close, subgraph_Smooth, 50); sc.MovingAverage(sc.Close, subgraph_Smooth, MOVAVGTYPE_SMOOTHED, 50); SmoothedMovingAverage_S(sc.Close, subgraph_Smooth, i, 50, 0); All of the above produce the same results (they look close but not exactly like simple-moving-avg 50 period), but they differ significantly from the study in SierraChartStudies_64 "Moving Average - Smoothed." I can easily see the difference by drawing both studies into the main region. Can you tell me why the outputs are different? Thanks. Date Time Of Last Edit: 2021-07-19 02:33:11
|