Support Board
Support Board
Search Board
Control Panel
View My Posts / Threads
Direct MessagesDate/Time: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 20:20:00 +0000
Post From: denali dom
| [2019-08-08 23:27:29] |
| |
|
There are two possibilities. The CQG depth is inaccurate which is a very strong possibility. Or CQG could be merging in what is called implied depth. The CME provides two levels of implied depth. In about a week we are going to merge in the implied depth. But only for the top level. Not for the second level for performance reasons. But eventually we can get to the second level. However, if you see differences from level 3 through 10, then CQG is absolutely wrong. We can say that with total confidence. Unless it happens to be the CME is giving out more than two levels of implied depth but their specification is quite clear on that. It is two levels. If you see differences after 10 levels, if you are on the Denali feed, then we can also say with confidence CQG is wrong as well. Because we have absolutely no packet loss on that feed and we are processing the market by order data correctly. Reference: https://www.cmegroup.com/confluence/display/EPICSANDBOX/MDP+3.0+-+Consolidating+Implied+and+Multiple+Depth+Books We will also get out the 500 levels, in about a week. That should not be a problem at all. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing Date Time Of Last Edit: 2019-08-08 23:34:26
|