Login Page - Create Account

Support Board


Date/Time: Sat, 04 May 2024 04:57:14 +0000



Post From: Problem with Overlay Studies' Scales

[2019-06-02 00:19:48]
User1990 - Posts: 48
Hello,

I have a few questions regarding the following chart (link below) that I am wondering if you can please help me take a look at.

http://www.sierrachart.com/image.php?Image=1559433411548.png

First, in Region 2, I overlaid two Williams studies with one True Strength Index study. I set the two Williams studies to be a scale of -100 to 0 and the TSI study to be a scale of -1 to 1. The lines seem to be correct. However, I cannot confirm that the two Williams studies are indeed between -100 to 0 as only the scale for the TSI study seems to show up (on the left hand side). The right hand side is empty in terms of scale values. I am wondering if there is a way to confirm that the two Williams studies are indeed on a separate scale than the TSI study? The same problem happens in Region 3 where only the scale of MACD seems to show up (somehow on both sides) even though I set the scale for the two Stochastic studies to be between 0 to 100. I just wanted to confirm that these two Stochastic studies are indeed independent to MACD in scale.

Secondly, I am wondering if there is a way to change the display value format for the studies in Regions 2,3 and 4? I tried changing the value format in their respective settings menus but it didn't seem to help. All the studies' value format seems to take after the value format of the symbol itself (with the exception of Region 2), which in this case (GBPUSD) happens to have a lot of decimal places.

Lastly, is there a way to decrease the space between the scale and the border? I am hoping solving the value format problem for the overlay studies, especially Volume study could resolve this but I am not entirely sure so I just thought I'd throw this question in as well.

Sorry for the question overload. Thanks so much for your help.

Best Regards,

Elaine