Support Board
Support Board
Search Board
Control Panel
View My Posts / Threads
Direct MessagesDate/Time: Fri, 03 May 2024 08:58:55 +0000
Post From: Concurrent data feeds
| [2013-10-13 06:41:57] |
| SKY - Posts: 45 |
|
stupid answers who is the genious ... 1. memory size values were copied from the WINDOWS memory resource manager so you know better ha ? 2. disk space is the minor problem - the need to update them all is a problem. why the user needs to update few of them if he could updated a single copy which is if SC software will be improved ... as requested 3. http://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=doc/MultipleServices.html#TwoConnectionsSameCopy did you read what is written under this URL ? running multiple copies - and this is what should be avoided ... already explained why ... so either the writer is stupid and doesn't get what is written or .... 4. and the last stupidity says : "Additionally, by running multiple copies of Sierra Chart, you are able to distribute processing across multiple CPU cores. And also instability in one, will not affect the other" let's go thru : (a) "by running multiple copies of Sierra Chart, you are able to distribute processing across multiple CPU cores" pure stupidity - your ability to control different CORES usage is extremely higher when executed thru a single application where you can tie threads to a given CORE. where did you study this level of stupidity ... get back to school and tell them u didn't understand the stuff (b) And also instability in one, will not affect the other If you have a bug then it will appear at all copies running simultaneously - don't you have a brain ? If there is a bug - fix it ... don't reproduce it !! I hope SC main designer is reading all this stuff and know that it is pure rubbish have a great week guys ... Date Time Of Last Edit: 2013-10-13 06:43:28
|