Support Board

Date/Time: Sun, 05 May 2024 07:43:03 +0000

Post From: Back Test Speed

[2018-04-16 13:01:45] Link To Thread - Link To Post [Go To First Post]
Sierra Chart Engineering - Posts: 104368
If you were to use ACSIL instead of Spreadsheets you will improve performance. Refer to: Automated Trading From an Advanced Custom Study And we did say we are working on improving Spreadsheet performance, to the extent we can. Two of our programmers are working on this full-time right now. To what extent we can do this, still remains to be seen. The point we were trying to make, there is not something wrong with bar based back testing in regards to how it works according to the documentation. Now whether it is accurate or not, you have to make that judgment. But what you can conclude is that obviously if you want accurate results it is going to be time-consuming. There is not any other way to do this. If you still get poor performance even with ACSIL, then you just have to realize that accurate results is time-consuming. Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, change to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing Date Time Of Last Edit: 2018-04-16 13:01:55