Support Board
Date/Time: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 21:25:40 +0000
Denali Data versus CQG.....Not even close to similar
View Count: 1735
| [2022-03-21 14:46:53] |
| Infinite - Posts: 134 |
|
I am new to the Denali data feed, I have been using CQG for years. I use Pulling data for trade entry on an AutoTrade program. Visually these 2 data feeds as far as PULLING data are not even close to similar. One would assume that the same math is done the same in SC on both feeds unless both feeds are DIFFERENT. 1st picture is DENALI after a few minutes, The second one is CQG after a few minutes. https://www.sierrachart.com/image.php?Image=1647873704102.png https://www.sierrachart.com/image.php?Image=1647873960153.png
|
| [2022-03-21 14:50:52] |
| Infinite - Posts: 134 |
|
I do realize that these are not running at the same time BUT the Pulling numbers are negative and yellow. After a while all except for a few just disappear off of the DENALI feed, and the only ones shown are at the market Bid/Ask levels, so something is not the same.
|
| [2022-03-21 16:00:20] |
| |
|
Pulling and stacking calculations are difficult to do, and with the Denali Exchange Data Feed, it is much more precise. We explain this here: CQG Trading Platform Service: CQG Market Depth Data Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy: https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing Date Time Of Last Edit: 2022-03-21 16:00:30
|
To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account: