Login Page - Create Account

Support Board


Date/Time: Sat, 10 May 2025 23:38:00 +0000



Bar Numbering

View Count: 735

[2016-05-21 17:49:16]
mkata - Posts: 103
There is a slight inaccuracy present on the current CLN6 contract when using the Bar Numbering Study with a 1_range or 1_tick chart with the start time set at 18:00:00.
Please see attached from 5-19-2016.
imageCLN6 0.01 Range .png / V - Attached On 2016-05-21 17:45:45 UTC - Size: 41.57 KB - 272 views
imageCLN6 1 Trades .png / V - Attached On 2016-05-21 17:45:55 UTC - Size: 30.17 KB - 290 views
[2016-05-21 22:23:28]
mkata - Posts: 103
I think I solved the problem by changing the code from SCDateTime to SCDateTimeMS.
[2016-05-22 00:15:34]
Sierra Chart Engineering - Posts: 104368
Interesting, OK we understand the nature of the problem.

That solution appears to be correct. We will look at this carefully and implement the appropriate solution.
Sierra Chart Support - Engineering Level

Your definitive source for support. Other responses are from users. Try to keep your questions brief and to the point. Be aware of support policy:
https://www.sierrachart.com/index.php?l=PostingInformation.php#GeneralInformation

For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, *change* to the Teton service:
Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing

To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account:

Login

Login Page - Create Account