Support Board
Date/Time: Sat, 21 Mar 2026 15:08:43 +0000
Why does this study have a high MS time
View Count: 126
| [2026-02-03 01:26:46] |
| User357195 - Posts: 194 |
|
Why does the study for "High-Low for Time Period - Extended" has such a 7289 MS time for the SilH6, when the NQ, which is very fast and volatile and has more volume only has a "High-Low for Time Period - Extended" 230 MS time? The GC is even worse than the SIL. I have seen the GC have a MS time for "High-Low for Time Period - Extended" of about 15000 MS. I have attached a screenshot for the SIL and the NQ and highlighted the high MS time for "High-Low for Time Period - Extended" in yellow. I think this all started when I update to version 2868 and now that I am on 2873, it still continues. I am a One Up Trader whose only choice is to use a Rithmic feed into Sierra Charts. Date Time Of Last Edit: 2026-02-03 01:43:34
|
 SILH6 studies list showing High-Low for Time Period - Exten.png / V - Attached On 2026-02-03 01:25:48 UTC - Size: 215.58 KB - 37 views NQ screenshot showing how the same High-Low for Time Period .png / V - Attached On 2026-02-03 01:26:03 UTC - Size: 213.97 KB - 31 views |
| [2026-02-03 15:26:04] |
| John - SC Support - Posts: 45204 |
|
Offhand, we would think that there are probably different amounts of loaded bars in the different charts, possibly along with differences in the setup for the "Number of Days to Calculate" for the study itself.
For the most reliable, advanced, and zero cost futures order routing, use the Teton service: Sierra Chart Teton Futures Order Routing |
To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account: