Support Board
Date/Time: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 11:54:42 +0000
[User Discussion] - Separate Instance vs Chartbooks
View Count: 128
| [2025-07-13 22:28:45] |
| User741544 - Posts: 25 |
|
Looking for advice as for the best option here. I’ve only got one connected feed to one account for live trading which is a CQG feed. But due to the need to set up many spread markets to map as trade only symbols within various DOMs I’m wondering whether setting up another instance makes the most sense, or just to have a core chartbook using all Denali only symbols to preserve ability to SIM when connected to the SC data since I would never need to access both at the same time? In other words would you just suggest I save the chartbook with all the trade only symbol protocols to convert the SC symbols to the CQG symbols for execution and just switch to that one when connected to CQG and back to the all Denali one when connected to the SC feed? As opposed to using two separate instances I mean. Please advise thanks.
|
| [2025-07-13 22:54:03] |
| User741544 - Posts: 25 |
|
…oh, also one other question which goes with the ones above I have regarding SIM trading. Assuming I do have a live CQG account as another connection besides the SC data connection, is there anything I need to do especially given some DOMs in the one chartbook have trade only symbols set up, is there any other precaution or things I need to know to ensure intended SIM test trading or the like don’t get sent to the live account? Such as when connected to say the CQG account in simulation mode but SIM trading not supported in the CQG API, or even when connected to the SC data but have a trade only symbol protocol set up? Thanks again John.
|
To post a message in this thread, you need to log in with your Sierra Chart account: